.svg){kind=small}
.svg){kind=small}
This article demonstrates real-world examples of the different types of flaws found only through manual testing.
Application-Penetration-Testing-Versus-Vulnerability-Scanning.pdf (823 KB)
Like what you see? Share with a friend.
From Policy to Practice: Penetration Testing for ISO 27001
ISO 27001:2022 is the international standard for establishing, implementing, maintaining, and continually improving an Information Security Management System (ISMS). While the standard does not explicitly mandate penetration testing, it remains a critical supporting activity for demonstrating technical assurance and verifying the effectiveness of security controls. By incorporating regular, scoped, and risk-aligned penetration testing into their […]
ISO 27001 & AI: Don’t Rebuild. Extend.
As organisations race to integrate AI for competitive advantage, we rarely see a lack of activity. Instead, we see a variation in strategy, often resulting in missed opportunities for efficiency. We tend to see businesses fall into one of three categories. First, there are those pushing for speed; deploying AI rapidly to gain an edge while viewing […]
Email Security Isn’t Working! Why Most Organisations Are Still at Risk and What to Do Next?
Email remains the most exploited attack vector in cybersecurity despite years of investment in secure email gateways, phishing filters, awareness training, and cloud-native tools. For many organisations, these defences are simply no longer enough. At Dionach, we see this reality firsthand. Across penetration tests, adversary simulations, and threat-led assessments, email continues to be one of the most […]